Unexpected Setbacks

2009 November 6
by jimkeyes

Well, it’s been a long time since I’ve posted anything here at “Analog Inheritance”. I expected this project to have it’s difficulties- gear that didn’t work, mismatched connectors, hum-whatever, but I never saw this coming.

Back in June, my wife, our dog and I took a long drive from our home in Westchester County, New York to Lake Lure, North Carolina where my Mom still lives. The plan was to wade through the storage units where Dad kept his gear. We would catalog what was in there and take some to use up here. One of the families that I teach generously offered us their (large) pickup truck for the trip.

Toyota Tundra

A family I teach loaned us their truck to make the epic journey to North Carolina and back

We started out early in the morning and, a day and a half later, we were in Lake Lure. One of my sisters came up from Atlanta to help out. Thank heavens. We opened up the storerooms and were met with this:

Big Mess Analog Recording Gear

This was just part of the mind-boggling mess we were greeted with.

Um, holy crap. The pictures really don’t do it justice. They also don’t convey the dust and mold. The storage place was fine- cool and dry- everything you’d want to store this kind of equipment. The problem was that before the move to North Carolina, Dad had been storing this stuff in the basement and garage of the house I grew up in. The house with the garage and basement that was prone to flooding. Ugh. The gear was spread out over three storage units, stuffed to the gills.

IMG_2546

Inside one of three storage units. This one was about halfway emptied out when this picture was taken.

I promised my Mom that between what gear I took home and consolidation, we could fit it into two units and save her some money. And that’s exactly what we did. We loaded up the truck with as much as we could fit, took some stuff to the dump and we were down to two units. The next day, we headed back to New York.

Back home, it was time to start putting some of this stuff to use. I have to admit, I had some seriously mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I was kind of excited about getting my hands on some great old analog stuff. I was looking forward to finding out what all the fuss was about. On the other hand, well, I guess that it really cemented for me the fact that Dad was actually dead and gone. I think because we lived so far apart and didn’t see each other regularly, there wasn’t a constant reminder of his absence.

I brought some pieces into my studio; a couple of eq’s, a compressor, a two-track reel to reel, and set about testing it out. As you can imagine, some of it worked, some of it didn’t. For a while, I was really focused on getting things working and on patching it all together. But then something strange and totally unexpected happened. I found myself spending less and less time in the studio. It wasn’t intentional, or at least it didn’t feel that way, but the evidence was clear; the computer was never turned on, there were cables everywhere and the whole place took on an abandoned look. It got so that I only went in to get instruments or gear that I needed for gigs. When I was done, I’d just toss the stuff back into to the room without actually going in. I kept the door shut.

Outside of the studio, I had no energy. I was tired all the time. Some days, I couldn’t get out of bed. I started to gain weight really fast. I was carrying this constant sadness. My wife was getting worried and insisted I see a doctor.

“Well, there’s good news and bad news.” the doctor said, “Your tests are all negative, so we have to look elsewhere. Are you depressed?”

“Um, I don’t think so.”

Turns out I was wrong.

I’m not going to bore you with the details of my recovery. I’ll just say that I’ve never experienced anything like this and I hope not to again. This was, without a doubt, the worst Summer I’ve ever had. I’m very grateful for modern medicine and the people who practice it.

In an effort to get back to work, I removed all of Dad’s gear from my studio. I’d had ten years of producing music without it, I could probably go longer.  For a while, I thought that I’d get rid of it. My mom offered to get someone in to remove the remaining gear in North Carolina. I briefly considered getting out of music all together. My doctors advised  me not to do anything rash.

As the depression began to lift, and I found myself back at work, I would occasionally think, “I really need a good eq for this.”. Then I’d go get one from storage and patch it in- with no ill effect. Inspired by this, I got back to planning my integrated studio. It’s more or less up and running now, but of course it’s a work in progress.

Just like this blog.

Zoom H-2

2009 June 2
H2_and_accessoires-web

The Zoom H2 Handy Recorder and Accessories.

This is not an entry about analog gear, or even high-end gear at that. This post is about a little digital piece of gear that was my Dad’s. It’s also about changing technology.

The Zoom H4 Handy Recorder

The Zoom H4 Handy Recorder

In 2006, I bought myself a Zoom H4 Handy Recorder with the idea that I could surreptitiously record my performances and post them to my website as podcasts. I didn’t have high expectations for the quality of the device, but it seemed to me that, for this purpose, it would be more than sufficient. Up to this point, I had been using a MiniDisc recorder, which was awkward and kind of a pain to work with. The discs could only hold 74 minutes of audio and were prone to dropouts. The only way to transfer audio from the minidisc to a computer was to route the headphone output to an input on my Digi 001 and play the disc while recording in ProTools. It was time consuming and awkward. I thought, at the very least, that the H4 would speed up the process- not to mention that it would hold more audio.

Here I'm doing an Early American Music Workshop at St. Paul's National Historic Site in Mount Vernon, NY. Photo by Mikey Colon

Here I'm doing an Early American Music Workshop at St. Paul's National Historic Site in Mount Vernon, NY. You can't see it, but I'm using the Zoom H2 to record the workshop (it's hidden behind the guitar). Photo by Mikey Colon

The first time I used the H4 was at a school I was visiting to do a Colonial music workshop. For these jobs, I show up in Colonial clothing, with reproduction instruments. I play and interpret music from that era and a good time is had by all. I set the device up behind me (I didn’t want the kids to play with it), pressed record, and went about my business. No monitoring, no setting levels- it’s like taking a picture with your eyes closed. I’d see what I’d got later.

At home, I transferred the audio to my computer via the USB 2.0 port on the H4. It was quick and painless. I imported the audio into ProTools LE and listened. I was really impressed. It was a very accurate reproduction of the experience. It sounded like I was talking and singing in a classroom, which, I remind you, is exactly what I was doing. I could hear the students’ questions, I could hear them moving around and dropping things. I could hear, with startling clarity, the number of times I answered with, “uhh…”

That Christmas, I told Dad about the Zoom H4 and how happy I was with it. When he got back to North Carolina, he bought one of his own and began recording every concert he went to. He was sitting at the kitchen table, holding the H4, staring at it. “When I think about all the equipment I used to drag out to record…” he trailed off and finally said, “and this is better.”

He used the H4 to record concerts at UNC Asheville, prompting them to buy an H4 of their own.

When Zoom came out with the next generation Handy Recorder, the H2, Dad had to have one of his own. He ordered it before his cancer diagnosis. By the time it arrived, he was too sick to be roaming around recording concerts and told me to bring it home. I did, but I told him that I’d return it to him when he got better.

I’ve been using it ever since.

Every Spring, the choir at Temple Beth Shalom in Hastings, New York performs a concert. The program is always an interesting take on Jewish music, from modern composers to traditional music. I began recording the choir and their concerts over ten years ago. Dad helped me with the first one. We went in armed with a Sony DAT recorder, and a bunch of mics. Dad had wanted to go full-on with Neumann 87’s up front and Scheopps placed as spot mics. This would have been optimal, but the mostly amateur choir was getting uneasy with all these mics around. The choir director didn’t like the look of the mics. This was primarily a concert, after all, not a recording session. I had brought with me a pair of Crown PZMs which I set up in front of the choir, on squares of wood placed on the floor, about six feet apart. Dad was really skeptical about this setup, but the audience had no idea that there were recording mics and the choir seemed to forget as well. Once the concert was underway, Dad put on his headphones, listened intently, then turned to me and said, “Well you’re just damn lucky that worked.”

One of the Crown PZMs used in the Beth Shalom recording.

One of the Crown PZMs used in the Beth Shalom recording.

The recording turned out really well and I’ve been doing it ever since. Over time, my role with the choir shifted. It started out with me playing accordion or mandolin on one or two of the concert pieces. Before too long, I was a full-on member of the choir, singing in the tenor section and backing up soloists as an instrumentalist. The choir still needed to be recorded, though. I was uneasy about recording them without monitoring, but you gotta do what you gotta do. That’s where the H-2 comes in. It can be mounted on a mic stand, which I did. Ideally, I would have liked to have set it just behind the conductor, over her head, to pick up what she’s hearing. Instead, I set it up in about the third row. It would have to be a little to the right to keep the center aisle free. I turned it on about five minutes before the concert and hoped for the best. Here’s how it turned out: Kol Dodi , arragned by Elliot Levine.

UREI 546 Results

2009 April 30
ureirack

Here's the UREI racked up and connected to a PreSonus FireStudio and two Behrninger ADA8000s.

It’s never as easy as you think it’s gonna be. I figured all I’d have to do is route the audio out of the Presonus FireStudio into the UREI 546 and then back into the FireStudio. How hard can that be? Well, I’ll tell you.

The FireStudio, being a semi-professional grade device, only has TRS outputs on it. The UREI, being a professional grade device, only has XLR connectors. I suppose the easiest way to connect them would have been to get cables with TRS on one end and XLR on the other, but that would really only work for this instance and I’ve been thinking farther ahead to when more of Dad’s gear gets in here. What I needed was a device that would increase my inputs and outputs (preferably using XLRs) without putting me in the poorhouse. This isn’t a hobby for me. It’s my business and I have to keep costs down to make a profit.

mismatched

The TRS connectors are in the top right of the picture. The XLRs are below.

After casting about on the Internet, I came across an article originally published in Electronic Musician Magazine and later archived on their web site. The article, “The Sum of All Tracks” was published in 2006 and discussed their investigation into analog summing. Analog summing, for my less geeky readers, is a mixing process by which the individual audio tracks are routed out of the computer and into either an analog mixing board or a summing box . Then they are then combined and fed back into the computer. This is much like how audio tracks were mixed before computers. Individual tracks of a multitrack tape machine were routed through a mixer, mixing those tracks together and feeding the output to a two-track tape machine. This has been kind of a hot topic for the past few years. Much like the “tastes great/less filling” debate of light beer drinkers, this one doesn’t seem to be going away any time soon.

Anyway, the Electronic Musician article tested three different setups. One was “in the box” (meaning that it was mixed entirely within the computer). The second was the “budget” setup involving two Behringer Ultragain Pro ADA8000s. The third was the “expensive” setup. If you want to know more about it, you can read the article. I went with “budget” and found two of the Behringer units in a scratch and dent sale. Behringer seems to have a pretty bad reputation on the message boards but, I’ve got to tell you, everything that I’ve used by them has worked well and does what it claims to do (and I’ll remind you that the subtitle of this blog is “Vintage high-end analog meets modern low-end digital”).

Once the Behringers arrived, it was a simple matter of hooking up the ADAT Lightpipe connectors from the Presonus FireStudio to the ADA800s. Suddenly, I had 16 XLR outputs and, coupled with the Presonus, 24 XLR inputs. Nice.

Here are the ADAT connections on the back of the Behringers. Note that you can choose 48k or 41k when the unit is used as a master. As a slave it's only 41k.

Here are the ADAT connections on the back of the Behringers. Note that you can choose 48k or 41k when the unit is used as a master. As a slave it's only 41k.

The next step was to take an already existing mix and run it through the UREI 546. I opened up a new Logic Pro session and imported a mix I had just worked on, the title track to my up-coming CD “Restraining Order”. I routed the output to outputs 23 and 24, happy to note that Logic recognized the Behringers without me having to lift a finger. From there, I ran XLR cables out of the Behringer and into the UREI, then out of the UREI and into the Presonus. I opened up a new stereo track in Logic and assigned it the inputs from the UREI. It was time to play.

As soon as I hit Play in Logic, something terrible happened. The song was playing, but it had this terrible digital distortion. If you’ve never heard digital distortion, consider yourself lucky. I was considering putting an audio sample in here, but that’s just cruel.

When these unexpected things come up, I’ve learned not to panic. I just shut everything down, leave the room and think. When you’re staring at a screen and hearing what sounds like TOTAL COMPUTER FREAKOUT!!!, it’s hard to be rational. It’s just time to do something else.

At some point in the day, it dawned on me that what I was hearing was indeed TOTAL COMPUTER FREAKOUT!!!, and here’s why: I was so pleased that Logic “saw” the new Behringer units that I never went in to check the settings. Duh. The Presonus’ default word clock setting is 48000.0 hz. The Behringers can only operate at 44100.0 hz. Double duh. Once I fixed this, I was good to go.

The UREI had no issues whatsoever. It was clean and quiet. I had a lot of fun just turning the dials and affecting the sound. Usually, when I’m eq-ing on the computer, I think in terms of numbers and frequency. I’m typing in figures into the input fields on the eqs, or I’m using the mouse to manipulate knobs. Working the UREI was a whole different experience. It seemed much more akin to playing an instrument. It was much less visual and much more auditory. It had to be. I mean, sure the knobs said 2 or 4 db, but there was a lot of room for movement between the steps. Same with the frequencies. I found myself doing less thinking and more, well, listening.

And isn’t that what this is about?

I’d love to tell you all how much more fabulous the track sounded after I eq’d it in the UREI, but I can’t. I don’t think it sounded worse, I just expected more from it. But then there’s that thing that Dad would have said, “It’s not the gear, it’s the guy.” And, if one views a piece of analog gear as an instrument, this was my first time out on it. I should take some of the advice I give my music students, “Relax, you’re not playing, you’re learning.”

I hope you’re learning too. If you’re curious, here’s the before and after.

UREI 546

2009 April 22
UREI 546

UREI 546 Dual Parametric Equalizer

Normally, when I’ve finished tracking a project in Logic Pro, I bounce the mix down to a hard drive and then import that mix into Waveburner for mastering.

waveburnersession

Waveburner Screenshot

This has worked quite well for a long time and continues to work. It’s quick and easy and sounds quite good. I like the adaptive limiter, the metering, and the EQ is pretty useful. I tend not to do a lot of EQ in the mixing or mastering stages. One of the things my Dad drilled into me early on was the importance of getting the sound you want before you record, so it’s pretty rare that I have to do any “fixing” EQs. When I think back on weekend remotes that he dragged me to as a kid, there was never any EQ involved-just some Electro-Voice RE-15’s and an Ampex 3oo in a road case.

As for mastering, Dad had told me to find a spot in the 1.5 to 2Khz range by sweeping till it “popped”. “You’ll know it when you hear it.” he said. Once the spot was found, set it with the broadest Q possible and boost at 1.5 to 2db. “Any more than that and something’s wrong. I don’t know if you can do it with a computer- you need a nice EQ.” he was quick to add. I’ve always mastered with that approach in mind, even though I’ve been using software EQ’s. I’ve never had the opportunity to work with a “nice” EQ.

Today’s the day, though. One of the first pieces that I’ve brought into my studio is a UREI 546 Dual Parametric Equalizer. I was immediately attracted to it simply because it said UREI. Everybody’s played with a UREI 1176, software or hardware. This is a solid state EQ with four sweepable bands and an adjustable Q on all bands. It also has sweepable high and low cut filters on each channel. Best of all, the Q knobs are also push/pull pots that function as bypass switches for each band. It’s nice to be able to A/B the individual bands. On the back is a switch to that allows the unit to operate as a mono eight-band EQ, if you’re into that kind of thing.

The concentric knobs on the bottom control the frequency and gain, respectively. The knobs above are responsible for bandwidth and bypass. The top knobs manage the high and low cuts.

The concentric knobs on the bottom control the frequency and gain, respectively. The knobs above are responsible for bandwidth and bypass. The top knobs manage the high and low cuts.

When I first got this home, it was dirty and moldy from having been stored poorly. I cleaned it up, plugged it in and nothing happened. Nothing. No lights. No nothing. Then I looked on the back panel and noticed that there was no fuse in the fuse bay. There was also no cover on the fuse bay. I scoured eBay and other sites, but couldn’t seem to find the right fuse cover. In desperation, I took it up to my friends at Ossinning Music. They don’t deal in this kind of gear, but they’re used to me and my crazy requests (“I need to figure out how to wear a bass drum on my back and make it playable..” “I need a banjo for a job tomorrow..” etc.) Two days later, they called me. “We’ve got a fuse and a cover. It powers up, but we’ve got no way to test it.” I didn’t care. I picked it up, brought it home and racked it. Now, I’ll find out if it works.

UREI 546 Fuse

The fuse cover is the white square. Note the CBS Records inventory badge.

This unit is not generally considered to be a “mastering” EQ. I’m not remotely bothered by this, for a number of reasons. First, I’ve been mastering with software, for crying out loud. Second, Dad was a real believer in “it’s not the gear, it’s the guy”.  When Dad started out in recording, the engineers were building their own gear. It was a real “by hook or by crook” time-before manufacturers were meeting their needs. Engineering was a skill dependent job. If you were good, you could make anything work.

Dad, as you may have guessed, was really down on computers and how easy he thought they made things. But then something funny happened. After he retired, he moved down to North Carolina, where he got friendly with the music department at UNC Asheville. Wayne Kirby, the department chair, invited Dad to come down and speak to the students. “I don’t know what I’m gonna talk to them about.” He was actually worried that he’d have nothing to say after thirty five years in the business. When I asked him how it went he said, “I was gonna break it down by each decade I worked, but we only got through the first couple of years.” He was genuinely surprised by how many questions the students had and he seemed puzzled that he’d had something to offer them. “Well,” he said, “computers or no, you still gotta know where to put the mic.”

After that, he got himself an Mbox and a Dell PC and began to talk about transferring his reel to reels. When I started going through his stuff, the Mbox was still unopened and the PC, while not in the box, had never been set up.

Allright, enough talk. I’ve got an EQ to play with. I’ll let you know how it turns out.

A Word About Analog Inheritance

2009 April 21

My name is Jim Keyes. I’m an independant musician. I’m so independant, in fact, that it borders on the obscure. Nevertheless, I’ve made my living as a musician and performer for over fifteen years.

I come from a long line of obscure musicians and performers. My grandfather was a Vaudeville song and dance man that no one has ever heard of. I have a great uncle, or some such, (also named Jim Keyes) who had a big band in North Carolina that he wrote and published music for.

My father, Larry Keyes, is perhaps the best known of us. He was a staff engineer for Columbia Records for 35 years. He worked on some of their best known albums, from working as Tape Op on Dylan’s “The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan” to garnering a Grammy Nomination for Best Engineered Classical Recording (Gustav Holst, The Planets” Eugene Ormandy and the Philadelphia Orchestra, 1975) and everything in between. He was one of the Quad engineers, back when that was popular. He made Quad mixes for Santana and Leonard Bernstein (“Mass” 1971).

In August of 2007, Dad was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. He died November 23, 2007.

Throughout his career at Columbia (and later, Sony) Dad would bring home gear that was rotated out of commission. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn’t. It had been his dream to build a studio of his own to work from once he retired. He never got a chance to fulfill that dream.

Meanwhile, I had been recording on my own. I had gotten a deal with a production library in 1999 and needed a way to record. Dad said, “Whatever you do, don’t get a computer. And if you do, for God’s sake, don’t get a MacIntosh.” Naturally I got a Power Mac G4 (400 Mhz) and pre-ordered a Digi-001 (they hadn’t quite come out yet) and I was off and running. Since that time I’ve moved on to a MacPro and Logic Studio 8. I’m using a Presonus Firestudio and Event monitors. All of my mixing and mastering has been “in the box”.

Since my Dad’s death, it has been my sad duty to catalog and examine all the gear he collected over those 35 years. My initial instinct was to sell it all off to get it out of my Mom’s hair. But every time I’m around his gear, I can’t help but feel Dad’s presence. Slowly, I’ll be bringing pieces into my digital studio and integrating them. This blog will be an account of that process. I have a lot to learn and a long way to go. I hope you’ll come along for the ride.

-Jim Keyes